Radheshyam Hota, astrologer and numerologist

I started this in 2020 to give numerology and Vedic astrology work that a client can actually inspect. That has meant three things in practice: every price is printed before you commit to anything, every service has a page that sets out the method rather than only the promise, and every reading arrives with a written summary you keep.

A session is a conversation, not a transaction, so the format follows the problem. Phone suits most questions. Video suits anything involving a chart or a plan. Email suits a written report, and is the only sensible route across timezones. In person suits Vastu, and anyone who would rather look at something together than describe it down a phone line.

More than 1,000 individual consultations have been delivered since 2020. There is no panel, no junior astrologer and no call centre. When you book, you are booking a session with me, and the person who reads your chart is the person you spoke to on the phone.

An accuracy percentage is only meaningful alongside a defined set of events, a stated time window, and a measurement method. This site used to carry one. It was an assertion rather than a measurement, and asserting it as though it were a finding is exactly the behaviour that has made this industry untrustworthy.

I do not quote an accuracy percentage, and I used to. A percentage is only worth anything next to a defined set of events, a stated window, and a published way of counting them, and I have not run that study. So rather than ask you to trust a number, I will show you how the reading is done and exactly what it covers, and you can judge the work yourself.

For the same reason there is no star rating and no review count anywhere on this site. A self-declared score with nothing behind it tells a visitor nothing useful, and publishing one breaks the review snippet guidelines of every major search engine. When there is a genuine public review profile I will link it here and let it speak for itself.